This is the blog page for Australia's Recreational Fishing.
Join us and stay up to date in the fight against those who seek to bully us off our beloved waterways.

HELP THE RECREATIONAL FISHING FAMILIES FIGHT
BACK!

Don’t let recreational anglers go unheard and get walked all over.
Time to Start fighting back!
We Fish and We have had enough...
We Want Recognition, Consultation, and a fair go...

email us at info@wefish.com.au

Friday, 12 October 2012

400kg whopper sparks debate


http://www.tourismportdouglas.com.au/400kg-whopper-sparks-debate-NEWSPORT.8432.0.html





The capture of 400.5kg black marlin in Port Douglass outraged do gooders.



There has been a relentless ant-fishing campaign over the last 20 years and its time we as anglers stop pandering to them in an futile attempt to appease them, they will never be happy until they are successful in totally restricting what we do. This anti-fishing campaign has been brutal, not only greatly influencing the general public but a great deal of angler as well, with their propaganda and lies.

Not only is recreational fishing if managed properly sustainable, has fantastic health benefits to those participating, has been responsible in providing vital information on species like the Marlin, fundamental in understanding and ensuring the survival of these species, but as a food source few other food sources would be able to compete with recreational fishing, on sustainability, lack of environmental impact and the carbon and water footprint.

Here in Australia we are just about to impose marine parks on our Coral Sea, the Black Marlin area. While the government and all the advocates agree that recreational fishing in the area is only a very small activity, and that the area is in pristine condition. They still chose to restrict us, while totally ignoring the real threats that the area faces today. We have had 300 marine scientist sign a document that included the request to not encourage catch and release fishing in the area, for marine scientist to be against catch and release fishing, a tool vital in their work, shows that this is a political statement not a scientific one, but more importantly shows what we are up against. The great danger is not that they will restrict us but that this anti-fishing campaign has distracted not only the advocates but the public at large from the real threats our marine environment faces.

The real threats that our marine species face including the Back Marlin are not from recreational fishing, the Black Marlin nursery area is in the Great Barrier Reef lagoons, close to shore the very area being decimated by coastal development, unless this relentless anti-fishing campaign is stopped it will all be too late, misinformation informing the general public that recreational fishing is the biggest threat to our marine species is doing a great disservice to the true conservation of these very species.

Yes the opinion of the general non fishing public is important, but we must stop being reactive and start be proactive, if we want our kids and future generations to enjoy what we enjoy, otherwise we will compromise ourselves into a position were fishing is seen as an activity of the past. We should be proud of what we do and not ashamed of it, and in this ever increasing online world, full of people that require no more than 3 sec to hit the like button in an attempt to somehow appease there conscious, armed with not even the basic information on the issue, we are up against it, but if we start compromising for their benefit then it’s already all over.


We should not be so keen to unnecessarily restrict what we do our selves, others will do that for us soon enough!


http://www.sportfishingmag.com/blogs/top-shots/hang-em-high#comment-8466

Thursday, 4 October 2012

funding cut for fishing in QLD



The (Qld) State Government has cut the line on funding to Sunfish, a key recreational fishing group that runs angler education programs like the popular Take a Kid Fishing days in Mackay.
But a Mackay tackle shop has swung in to do what the government can't manage.
Tackle World Mackay proprietor Neil Elworthy has given an assurance to Mackay fishing stalwart Lance Murray that next year's Take a Kid Fishing Day will go ahead under his sponsorship.
Sunfish is the latest victim on the Newman Government's cost-cutting regime.
Suntag, the organisation's fish monitoring and record keeping off-shoot, has also been wiped as a recipient of government funding.
Having amassed a database containing records of almost 700,000 fish movements, Suntag has existed since the 1970s.

http://www.dailymercury.com.au/story/2012/09/26/kids-fishing-day-funds-lost-mackay/


















http://sphotos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/47173_449246338451852_261456168_n.jpg





New fishing and diving rules at Grey Nurse Shark aggregation sites in NSW



Following the review of Grey Nurse Shark protection, several changes have been made to recreational fishing and scuba diving arrangements at Grey Nurse Shark critical habitat and other aggregation sites. A summary of the changes is presented below. For further information please see the Q&A page.

Recreational Fishing

  • The use of bait by recreational fishers in connection with line fishing methods is prohibited within Grey Nurse Shark critical habitat at:
  • In addition, the use of bait by recreational fishers in connection with line fishing methods is prohibited within 200 m of specified Grey Nurse Shark aggregation sites at:
  • Note that soft plastics, artificial baits and vegetable baits such as green weed may continue to be used.
  • All remaining critical habitat sites occur within marine parks and the recreational fishing rules at these sites are set out in the relevant marine park zoning plans. This includes:
  • The Bass Point critical habitat site will be delisted in accordance with recommendations from NSW DPI scientists and consideration will be given to realigning the shape of the Magic Point critical habitat site to maintain consistency with other sites and further reduce impacts on shore based fishing. In addition the buffer-zone regulations that surrounded critical habitat sites will also be revoked. The regulation amendments will occur progressively over the ensuing months and will include public notification and consultation.
  • All other recreational fishing activities will remain unaffected by the changes, including spinning and trolling with fly or artificial lure, use of soft plastics, jigging, crabbing, hand gathering and spearfishing (other than at Fish Rock – see below). However all other existing applicable regulatory controls continue to apply at each site.
  • Penalties of up to $22,000 or 6 months imprisonment (or both) for a first offence or $44 000 or 12 months imprisonment (or both) for second and subsequent offences apply for non-compliance with the new recreational fishing rules.
  • A 12 month compliance advisory period will operate following the introduction of the new rules. During this period formal cautions will be issued for first offences. Second and subsequent offences will be subject to standard compliance action.

Spearfishing

  • Existing spearfishing rules will not change other than at Fish Rock.
  • The existing regulations that have been in place since 31 July 1998 on the taking of fish within 500 m of the mean high water mark of Fish Rock will be reduced to align with the critical habitat of 200 m
  • The taking of any fish by spear or speargun is prohibited within the critical habitat of Grey Nurse Shark at Fish Rock other than:
    • Australian salmon
    • Mahi Mahi
    • Tailor
    • Cobia
    • Marlins and Sailfish (all species in the family Istiophoridae)
    • Mackerels and Tunas (all species in the family Scombridae)
    • Wahoo
    • Trevallies, Yellowtail Kingfish and Rainbow Runner (all species in the family Carangidae)
  • These rules predated the declaration of critical habitat and were implemented as part of resource allocation agreements between spearfishers and scuba divers, and were not related to Grey Nurse Shark protection.
  • All other existing applicable regulatory controls continue to apply.
  • Penalties of up to $11 000 apply for non-compliance with the spearfishing rules. 

Commercial Fishing

  • There are no changes to commercial fishing rules arising from the review of Grey Nurse Shark protection.
    Commercial fisheries will continue to be managed in accordance with relevant Fishery Management Strategies, the Fisheries Management Act 1994, Fisheries Management (General) Regulation 2010, and relevant fisheries management share management plan regulation.
  • The existing Ocean Trap and Line Export Approval notifications continue to apply at North Solitary Island, South Solitary Island, Fish Rock, Green Island and Magic Point.

SCUBA Diving

  • The existing critical habitat diving regulations will be replaced by the national Code of Conduct for Diving with Grey Nurse Sharks.
  • The Code of Conduct for Diving with Grey Nurse Sharks is voluntary however scuba divers should be aware that significant penalties exist for interfering with fish of a threatened species, including Grey Nurse Sharks.
  • Interfering includes harassing, chasing, tagging, marking or engaging in any activity for the purposes of attracting or repelling Grey Nurse Shark, including activities such as hand-feeding and use of shark repelling devices.
  • The penalties for interfering with Grey Nurse Sharks include fines of up to $110,000 or 2 years imprisonment (or both).
  • The Code of Conduct for Diving with Grey Nurse Sharks applies at all Grey Nurse Shark aggregation sites in NSW waters, and applies to recreational and charter diving operators.


Wednesday, 3 October 2012

AMCS anti fishing campaign



http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/seismic-stress-for-whales/story-e6frg6z6-1226484956084



WHEN shipping was stopped in Canada's Bay of Fundy following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on New York City, few could have predicted the positive impact it would have on the struggling population of northern right whales. 

As shipping was stopped and the waters stilled along the Atlantic coast of North America, there was a dramatic shift in results of long-term testing of the region's whales.

It was the first evidence that constant exposure to low-frequency ship noise may cause chronic stress in whales, with potentially devastating consequences for reproduction.
The findings have implications for all baleen whales, which communicate using low-frequency sound, including humpbacks, which pass though areas of heavy ship traffic.






Yet if you read Australian Marine Conservation Society’s submission into the Coral Sea they fail to mention anything about this threat. Here it is full for you



24th February 2012


Dear Sir/Madam,

Submission by the Australian Marine Conservation Society on the Coral Sea Commonwealth marine reserve proposal

The protection of Australia’s unique and diverse marine environment is of critical importance to the Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) and our 20,000 supporters across the country. AMCS appreciates the opportunity to provide a submission on the proposed Coral Sea Commonwealth marine reserve and we look forward to future engagement in the process.

Overview
The Marine Bioregional Planning process is an opportunity to deliver world class protection for Australia’s world class marine environment. Consequently, AMCS as a founding member of the Protect our Coral Sea coalition, is calling for the establishment of a very large, world-class, highly protected marine national park in the Coral Sea to protect its incredible natural features and marine life including, but not limited to, coral reefs, seamounts, troughs, critical spawning sites and migration routes.

AMCS welcomes the government’s policy commitment to implement a National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas. Delivering on such a commitment will position Australia as a world leader in marine conservation and be a true investment in the future of Australia’s marine environment and the economies that rely on its long term health and productivity. To meet this commitment, we recommend the government ensures that the networks of marine reserves for each of the South West, North West, North, Coral Sea, and Temperate East marine bioregions are declared under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act no later than the end of 2012.

AMCS welcomes the intention to establish a marine reserve in the Coral Sea, as part of a larger network or reserves around the country. The Coral Sea region is globally important for biodiversity as one of the healthiest areas that remain in our global ocean. The Coral Sea is home to 341 species which are listed on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species thereby providing Australia an opportunity to contribute to the conservation of globally threatened and important marine life.

Over the past four years thousands of AMCS supporters have written letters to their MPs and emailed successive Federal Environment Ministers asking for the protection of our iconic Coral Sea. They’ve done so in unison with tens of thousands of others who also support this important cause through the broader Protect our Coral Sea coalition. In addition, since the consultation period opened in November, many AMCS supporters have emailed formal submissions to the public consultation over the proposed marine reserve as individuals concerned about the conservation of the marine environment. At time of submission the Protect our Coral Sea coalition had facilitated over 60 000 submissions in support of greater protection. This makes the protection of the Coral Sea one of Australia’s most widely supported conservation initiatives of a lifetime.

The response by AMCS and Protect our Coral Sea supporters is just one indication of the huge community support, interest and expectation that exists for the meaningful protection of the Coral Sea. This high level of public support gives the government the mandate, indeed the duty, to ensure that the final marine reserve for the Coral Sea delivers a very high level of protection for the Coral Sea and for its coral reefs, seamounts, troughs, critical spawning sites and migration routes.

The protection of the Coral Sea in a very large highly protected Marine National Park Zone is supported by science. There is overwhelming scientific evidence that marine national parks are critical to the future of our oceans and that large marine national parks are particularly beneficial for marine life. Marine national parks help to protect and recover populations of threatened species, provide benefits to fish stocks and build resilience so the marine environment can better withstand the affects of climate change. This is particularly important in the Coral Sea where extreme weather events and the isolation of reefs make life in the Coral Sea all the more vulnerable. The numerous peer reviewed publications have, for example, been reviewed and summarised in a number of literature reviews.

The establishment of marine reserves is also supported by the economics. Marine reserves provide benefits to coastal communities and the broader economy. Nature based tourism is a predicted winner from the protection of the Coral Sea as an investment in its health is an investment in the industry’s assets.

AMCS believes the proposed marine reserve is a promising start however fails to deliver the level of protection required for this important area. The submission below provides general comments on the positives of the reserve as well as shortcomings and through these comments identifies the improvements needed.

The Positives
·         Scale of the marine reserve
The proposed reserve establishes an outer boundary of 989,842 km2. We welcome the scale of the proposed reserve as it matches the scale of important ecosystem processes such as dispersal and migration throughout the Coral Sea. At 989 842 km2, if the entire reserve were be highly protected in a Marine National Park Zone, it would provide protection for many pelagic species, being large enough to encompass significant proportions of their home ranges and life cycles, including yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (Thunnus obesus), striped marlin (Tetrapturus audax), and shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrhinchus) 
·         Prohibition of mining and oil and gas development
Mining of any kind has no place in a marine reserve and we welcome the proposal to exclude all such activity from within all zones of the marine reserve.

·         Prohibition of demersal fishing including demersal trawl, gillnet, and demersal longline
The impacts of demersal fishing are widely recognised. Compared to many other areas within Australia’s EEZ the Coral Sea’s depth and physical characteristics dictate there is minor opportunity for bottom fishing. We understand ABARES is currently assessing the level of trawling in the proposed reserve. We welcome the exclusion of this activity within the entire marine reserve.



The Shortcomings
AMCS believes that the proposed Coral Sea marine reserve fails to fully embrace the opportunity presented by the Coral Sea. The Coral Sea may be the world’s last great tropical ocean ecosystem where a highly protected marine reserve - on the scale of the proposed multiple use reserve - could be established and effectively managed. For Australia to let this opportunity pass by would be a great loss for marine life in our waters, for Australians and the global community. The following shortcomings need to be addressed to fully realise this opportunity:

·         Coral reef protection
Under the proposal only Kenn and Mellish Reef would receive a high level of protection in a Marine National Park Zone. The zoning within the proposed reserve would leave 22 reef systems unprotected from various forms of commercial fishing and 23 reef systems unprotected from commercial charter fishing. This would mean that 90% of the Coral Sea’s reef systems which aren’t already protected by Lihou and Coringa-Herald National Nature Reserves would continue to be unprotected from various forms of fishing. This is a very significant weakness of the proposal. AMCS believes all the coral reef systems should be fully protected under a single, very large Marine National Park Zone.

Coral reefs comprise less than 1% of the Coral Sea’s area. Global biodiversity patterns suggest they are likely to host the majority of it marine species.

219 species of coral that are known to exist in the existing Coral Sea Conservation Zone (CSCZ) are included on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Of these, 96 were listed as critically endangered, endangered, or vulnerable, therefore 42% of corals of the greatest conservation concern globally occur in the CSCZ. The Coral Sea’s reefs, shoals and cays are likely to be the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and the resulting acidification, temperate change and strong weather events that are predicted. Protecting these features from extractive activities such as fishing is our best management option to enable them to survive and recover from these impacts.

·         Seamount protection
The southern Coral Sea boasts several seamounts and is considered a global biodiversity hot spot for apex predators including the short fin mako (Isurus oxyrhinchus), blue sharks (Prionace glauca) and bronze whalers (Carcharhinus brachyurus). These features are inadequately protected under the proposal and the continuation of pelagic longline fishing in these areas is another serious weakness. Pelagic longline fishing should be removed from the entire area of the marine reserve, creating a globally significant safe haven for pelagic species that are under pressure elsewhere in the Pacific.


·         Trough protection
The Coral Sea contains Australia’s largest marine trough systems – the Queensland and Townsville troughs. These systems boast the only known black marlin spawning aggregation in the world as well as spawning aggregations of lanternfish, bigeye tuna and yellowfin tuna, listed by the IUCN as vulnerable and near-threatened respectively. The partial prohibition of longline fishing in the Townsville trough and for the entire Queensland trough is a positive move. All commercial fishing should be removed from these productive and important features. 

·         Overly complex zoning
For a very remote area such as the Coral Sea the proposed complex zoning arrangements may pose a significant challenge and be more costly to manage than a simpler zoning scheme. Research demonstrates that simpler zoning arrangements were more cost-effective to manage than more complex ones. A complex zoning arrangement will require greater resources to monitor and enforce.

·         Protection from commercial charter fishing
Commercial charter fishing in the Coral Sea is an activity undertaken by a small number of individuals, particularly when compared to regions such as the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. The impact of fishing on reef fish populations at isolated locations in the Coral Sea is unknown to science however, given the isolated and relatively undisturbed nature of these reefs, it is likely the reef fish populations are particularly vulnerable to even minor levels of fishing pressure. AMCS understands that the vast majority of commercial charter fishing occurs within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and hence that the exclusion of this activity would have very minimal impact upon the industry and yet would ensure the Coral Sea’s reefs are secure from this potential threat.


In summary, AMCS urges the Department to protect the Coral Sea’s coral reefs, seamounts, troughs, spawning sites and migration routes in a highly protected Marine National Park Zone. As one of the least impacted tropical marine environments on the planet, the Australian government has an opportunity to protect something truly special and secure Australia an enduring claim as a world leader in marine conservation.

We recognise the commitment of the Minister and Department to the protection of the Coral Sea as a beacon of hope in our global ocean. We commend your efforts to this point, however the aforementioned shortcomings must be addressed if this truly special place is to remain healthy and productive and be safeguarded for future generations of Australians and the global community.

We thank the Department for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Coral Sea Marine Reserve and look forward to our continued engagement with the department on this important development. Please do get in contact if we can provide further information or clarification of anything raised in this submission.

Yours sincerely,


Daisy Barham
Coral Sea campaigner, Australian Marine Conservation Society





As you can see nothing at all about shipping or the threat this possess to the species of the area, lots about fishing though.